padding_u32 appears to be dead and not tested.

This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/scythe-bug for category DeadCode if there's an issue with the CL content.
  See also go/scythe-known-issues.
* See go/abandoned-code for more information on what is considered dead code and why removing it is important.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* For all other issues such as the formatting of the CL, please file a bug under
go/clrobot-bug.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.

This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/video/METADATA by
following go/clrobot#how-to-opt-in. Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug
at go/clrobot-bug.

#codehealth

Tested:
    Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 596797565
Change-Id: I01cbdf234c27c10cca092afda94858c2ed35cacf

libwvdrmengine/oemcrypto/odk/include/odk_structs.h

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ extern "C" {
 #define ODK_MINOR_VERSION 0
 
 /* ODK Version string. Date changed automatically on each release. */
-#define ODK_RELEASE_DATE "ODK v19.0 2024-01-05"
+#define ODK_RELEASE_DATE "ODK v19.0 2024-01-09"
 
 /* The lowest version number for an ODK message. */
 #define ODK_FIRST_VERSION 16

libwvdrmengine/oemcrypto/odk/test/odk_test_helper.h

@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ struct ODK_ProvisioningResponseParams {
   ODK_CoreMessage core_message;
   uint8_t device_id[ODK_DEVICE_ID_LEN_MAX];
   uint32_t device_id_length;
-  uint32_t padding_u32;
   ODK_MessageCounterInfo counter_info;
   ODK_ParsedProvisioning parsed_provisioning;
   std::vector<ODK_Field> extra_fields;